我的女孩

商务部公告2026年第35号 公布对原产于印度的进口单模光纤所适用反倾销措施的期终复审裁定_我的网站

A |     　　2014年8月13日，商务部发布2014年第56号公告，决定自2014年8月14日起，对原产于印度的进口单模光纤征收反倾销税，税率为7.4%—30.6%，实施期限为5年。　　2020年8月13日，商务部发布2020年第29号公告，决定自2020年8月14日起，继续按照商务部2014年第56号公告公布的税率对原产于印度的进口单模光纤征收反倾销税，实施期限为5年。

B |     LOS ANGELES -- By the time the scuba dive boat sank off the Southern California coast after catching fire, 34 people had been killed in the deadliest maritime disaster in recent U.S. history.The Labor Day tragedy in 2019 spurred changes to maritime regulations, congressional reform and civil lawsuits. Now four years later, a federal trial for the Conception's captain, Jerry Boylan, is set to begin Tuesday with jury selection in Los Angeles.It's been a long, frustrating wait for the families of those who perished. They say a judge's ruling that their loved ones should not be called “victims” at trial has only added to their pain. “The past four years have been like living in a nightmare that you don’t wake up from,” said Kathleen McIlvain, whose 44-year-old son Charles was killed. The 75-foot (23-meter) boat was anchored off the Channel Islands, about 25 miles (40 kilometers) south of Santa Barbara, on Sept. 2, 2019, when it caught fire before dawn on the last day of a three-day excursion, sinking less than 100 feet (30 meters) from shore. The National Transportation Safety Board blamed Boylan for the tragedy, saying his failure to post a roving night watchman allowed the fire to quickly spread undetected, trapping the 33 passengers and one crew member below. Those on board included a new deckhand who’d landed her dream job and an environmental scientist who did research in Antarctica, along with a globe-trotting couple, a Singaporean data scientist, three sisters, their father and his wife. U.S. District Judge George Wu on Oct. 12 granted Boylan's request to bar most if not all references to “victims” — which the captain's attorneys say is a prejudicial term that jeopardizes his right to a fair trial. It's the latest setback for the prosecution.A grand jury in 2020 initially indicted Boylan on 34 counts of a pre-Civil War statute colloquially known as “seaman’s manslaughter” that was designed to hold steamboat captains and crew responsible for maritime disasters. Each count carries up to 10 years in prison in a conviction, for a total of 340 years.Defense lawyers sought to dismiss those charges, arguing the deaths were the result of a single incident and not separate crimes. Prosecutors got a superseding indictment charging Boylan with only one count.Then in 2022, Wu ruled the superseding indictment failed to specify that Boylan acted with gross negligence, saying that was a required element to prove the crime of seaman’s manslaughter. He dismissed that indictment, forcing prosecutors to go before a grand jury again.Boylan is now charged with one count of misconduct or neglect of ship officer. The single count means he faces only 10 years behind bars if convicted.He has pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing. His federal public defenders did not return The Associated Press' repeated requests for comment, and a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's Office declined to comment.Some of the dead were wearing shoes, prompting investigators to believe they were awake and trying to escape. Both exits from the below-deck bunkroom were blocked by flames. Coroner’s reports list smoke inhalation as the cause of death, though official autopsies were never conducted.What exactly started the predawn fire remains unknown. Early official scrutiny appeared to focus on a spot where divers plugged in phones and other electronics. But a Los Angeles Times story, citing a confidential report by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, said the blaze began in a plastic trash can on the main deck though an official cause remains undetermined. Boylan and four crew members sleeping in the upper deck told investigators they tried to save the others but were ultimately forced to jump overboard to survive. Boylan made a mayday call at 3:14 a.m. just before abandoning ship.Dozens of family members have since formed “Advocacy34” to push for strengthened boating regulations. While seeking answers, they’ve comforted each other during loved ones’ missed birthdays and mourned each anniversary.“We have no idea when we’ll get those answers, or if we ever will,” McIlvain said.At the time of the fire, no owner, operator or charterer had been cited or fined for failure to post a roving patrol since 1991, Coast Guard records showed.The NTSB faulted the Coast Guard for not enforcing that requirement and recommended it develop a program to ensure boats with overnight passengers actually have the watchman.The Coast Guard has since enacted new regulations regarding fire detection systems, extinguishers, escape routes and other safety measures as mandated by Congress. But it has yet to implement a comprehensive safety management system after industry advocates pushed back, citing costs.Victims' families have sued the Coast Guard in one of several ongoing civil suits.Three days after the inferno, Truth Aquatics Inc., which belongs to the Conception’s owners, Glen and Dana Fritzler, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles under a pre-Civil War provision of maritime law that allows it to limit its liability to the remains of the boat, which was a total loss. The time-tested legal maneuver has been successfully employed by the owners of the Titanic and other vessels, and requires the Fritzlers show they were not at fault.The couple's attorneys did not respond to requests for comment.In response to the families' outcry, federal lawmakers last year updated the Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 so owners can be held liable for damages regardless of the boat’s value afterward. The law is not retroactive, however, and will not apply in the case of the Conception.。

C | 　　2025年8月13日，应中国单模光纤产业申请，商务部发布2025年第42号公告，决定自2025年8月14日起，对原产于印度的进口单模光纤所适用的反倾销措施进行期终复审调查。

D | 　　商务部对如果终止反倾销措施，原产于印度的进口单模光纤倾销继续或再度发生的可能性，以及对中国单模光纤产业的损害继续或再度发生的可能性进行了调查，并依据《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》（以下简称《反倾销条例》）第四十八条作出复审裁定（见附件）。

E | 现将有关事项公告如下：　　一、复审裁定　　商务部裁定，如果终止反倾销措施，原产于印度的进口单模光纤对中国的倾销可能继续或再度发生，对中国单模光纤产业造成的损害可能继续或再度发生。　　二、反倾销措施　　依据《反倾销条例》第五十条的规定，商务部根据调查结果向国务院关税税则委员会提出继续实施反倾销措施的建议。国务院关税税则委员会根据商务部的建议作出决定，自2026年8月14日起，对原产于印度的进口单模光纤继续征收反倾销税，实施期限为5年。　　征收反倾销税的产品范围是原反倾销措施所适用的产品，与商务部2014年第56号公告和2020年第29号公告的产品范围一致。具体如下：　　被调查产品名称：单模光纤。　　英文名称：Single-mode Optical Fiber。　　被调查产品的具体描述：单模光纤是指在一定的波段范围内，只传输单一模式光信号的光纤。单模光纤的芯径通常在4-12μm范围内，包层直径为125μm左右，涂覆层直径在245μm左右。

F | 单模光纤具有传输速率快、传输距离长、传输容量大的特点。　　主要用途：单模光纤适用于各类光缆结构，包括光纤带光缆、松套层绞光缆、骨架光缆、中心束管式光缆、紧套光缆、皮线缆、碟形光缆等。单模光纤主要应用于高速率、长距离以及接入网传输，主要使用在长途干线、城域网、有线电视、光纤接入网（如FTTH）等网络。　　该产品归在《中华人民共和国进出口税则》：90011000。该税则号项下不符合被调查产品具体描述的其他种类的光纤、光导纤维束及光缆，不在本次调查产品范围之内。　　根据商务部2014年第56号公告和2020年第29号公告的规定，对各公司征收的反倾销税税率如下：　　1.斯德雷特科技有限公司                7.4%　　（Sterlite Technologies Limited）　　2.贝拉古河光纤有限公司                11.4%　　（Birla Furukawa Fibre Optics Limited）　　3.康宁技术印度有限公司                24.5%　　（Corning Technologies India Private Limited）　　4.阿克什光纤有限公司                    30.6%　　（Aksh Optifibre Limited）　　5.菲诺莱克斯电缆有限公司             30.6%　　（Finolex Cables Limited）　　6.其他印度公司                               24.5%　　三、征收反倾销税的方法　　自2026年8月14日起，进口经营者在进口原产于印度的单模光纤时，应向中华人民共和国海关缴纳相应的反倾销税。反倾销税以海关确定进口货物的计税价格从价计征，计算公式为：反倾销税税额＝海关确定进口货物的计税价格×反倾销税税率。进口环节增值税以海关确定进口货物的计税价格加上关税和反倾销税作为计税价格从价计征。　　四、行政复议和行政诉讼　　根据《反倾销条例》第五十三条的规定，对本复审决定不服的，可以依法申请行政复议，也可以依法向人民法院提起诉讼。　　五、本公告自2026年8月14日起执行　　附件：中华人民共和国商务部关于原产于印度的进口单模光纤所适用反倾销措施的期终复审裁定.pdf商务部2026年8月13日。

Current article:http://cq7.yukujuankewazuhangfei.sbs/news/20260826_9442.html

Published on:19:14:35